Re-Open Nominations

Benjamin C Ravenclaw · Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:36 pm

How the hell has Jakker been divisive?

Post by **Jakker** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:40 pm

Shadoke wrote:Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:36 pmHow the hell has Jakker been divisive?

As the one who has started the conversation, I have unintentionally been divisive and I acknowledge fault in my handling of the situation. At this point, RON is the most sensible solution for the community.

Rach · Post by **Rach** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:48 pm

Jakker wrote:Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:40 pm
Shadoke wrote:Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:36 pmHow the hell has Jakker been divisive?
As the one who has started the conversation, I have unintentionally been divisive and I acknowledge fault in my handling of the situation.

I think what you did was the right thing to do and well within the realm of normal debate and differing viewpoints.

Yuno · Post by **Yuno** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:12 pm

i hope this dispels any ill feelings of injustice.

Zaolat · Post by **Zaolat** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:26 pm

Cormac · Post by **Cormac** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 6:29 pm

Just as a note, all candidates except Andrew -- who hasn't been around -- are now voting to re-open nominations. We have nine votes. For a clear majority, we need twelve. There is no question in my mind that given enough time we would get twelve, but voting closes in just a few hours and it's extremely important for voters who are online in that time period to vote to re-open nominations. Other voters may not get online in that time period and we may fall short.

When all the candidates agree that we need time and breathing room, why object? Let's start this over and work through this, not rush into a new Pharaoh in less than four hours.

The Almighty Jesus Whale · Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:16 pm

I have thought long and hard about this, and I have spoken to multiple people regarding the issue.

At present, re opening nominations wins by one vote, and I plan to change my vote to put myself first.

This is not the beginning of a coup. This is putting my personal feelings aside for Osiris.

Osiris is broken and is in dire need of reform, and if we go through with this, we will not get what we need to flourish and thrive, we will be set back yet again, just as we were in October.

Ainocra was dragged down due to allegations that he would launch a coup, and because he was friendly with Trieze. I am not Ainocra, and I do not plan to coup, regardless of my origins and past affiliations. My heart is with Osiris, and I know that this is the last attempt that I can give to see to it that Osiris does not falter and continue down this path of decay.

Cormac · Post by **Cormac** » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:39 pm

The Almighty Jesus Whale wrote:Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:16 amI have thought long and hard about this, and I have spoken to multiple people regarding the issue.

At present, re opening nominations wins by one vote, and I plan to change my vote to put myself first.

This is not the beginning of a coup. This is putting my personal feelings aside for Osiris.

Osiris is broken and is in dire need of reform, and if we go through with this, we will not get what we need to flourish and thrive, we will be set back yet again, just as we were in October.

Ainocra was dragged down due to allegations that he would launch a coup, and because he was friendly with Trieze. I am not Ainocra, and I do not plan to coup, regardless of my origins and past affiliations. My heart is with Osiris, and I know that this is the last attempt that I can give to see to it that Osiris does not falter and continue down this path of decay.

This is a despicable action on your part. I will do everything in my power to ensure that you will never serve a single day in the Delegacy of Osiris.