Removal of an Atef Member

George Rahl Mountbatten VI · Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:41 pm

Support.

Tomb · Post by **Tomb** » Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:15 pm

I also second the motion.

Having worked with James in several regions, I learned that he was a really nice and cordial individual, however, there are rules and expectations that should be followed. Thus, I support the motion.

~ Tomb

Post by **Tim Stark** » Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:44 pm

Aye, I have nothing against James personally, and barely even know him. He does have a dapper avatar, though.

Alas, as said, we can't risk inactivity.

Zaolat · Post by **Zaolat** » Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:13 am

Abstain

Cormac · Post by **Cormac** » Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:28 am

Ainocra wrote:Fri Feb 13, 2015 11:07 pmI motion we proceed to vote

If this goes to vote before the three day minimum consideration period, I'll be voting against removal. Seriously, Ainocra, you need to better familiarize yourself with how the Deshret has done these things in the past.

Ainocra · Post by **Ainocra** » Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:59 am

Due to the gravity of this vote it was my intention to wait the entire three days already Cormac.

Removals should not in my view be rushed.

Cormac · Post by **Cormac** » Sat Feb 14, 2015 9:31 am

Ainocra wrote:Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:59 amDue to the gravity of this vote it was my intention to wait the entire three days already Cormac.

Removals should not in my view be rushed.

Oh, okay. I assumed with the motion to vote it was going to move to vote sooner, sorry.

Ainocra · Post by **Ainocra** » Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:30 pm

No worries, it was an understandable conclusion to draw.

Joshua Bluteisen · Post by **Joshua Bluteisen** » Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:26 pm

No issues with this. It's important for Atef to have a presence.

Ainocra · Post by **Ainocra** » Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:19 pm

Considering the gravity of this vote the Keeper elects to extend debate by an additional day at this time