Application for Criminal Case

Ainocra · Post by **Ainocra** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:00 pm

Defendant's Name:
Ridersyl

Charge/s:
Conspiracy to commit forum destruction, forum Destruction (of the AoI forum)

Evidence (e.g. a screenshot or a link to a post):
http://puu.sh/egmxx/1e1664b6d4.png

Other Pertinent Information:
The accused has made a full confession and shown remorse for his actions. However as a citizen he does have the right to a trial before this court.
A right that to my knowledge he has not waived.

War Wombat · Post by **War Wombat** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:14 pm

Um... that evidence is very... suggestive, is it not?

Post by **Lord Ravenclaw** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:12 pm

There is nothing suggestive about a pair of legs, Councillor. Unless of course you are from a country who views them as suggestive, upon which case you have my most sincerest apologies, condolences and the offer of free plane tickets to move somewhere with a better sense of what exactly would be defined as suggestive.

War Wombat · Post by **War Wombat** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:16 pm

Lord Ravenclaw wrote:Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:12 amThere is nothing suggestive about a pair of legs, Councillor. Unless of course you are from a country who views them as suggestive, upon which case you have my most sincerest apologies, condolences and the offer of free plane tickets to move somewhere with a better sense of what exactly would be defined as suggestive.

Well, I kind of am, I guess. I live in this weird little country called the United States, and we have this weird double standard about stuff like that. It is not so much that the legs were disliked as that they were unexpected, particularly in a court document.

Post by **Tim Stark** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:06 am

Not sure if I'm able to post here or not, but it doesn't exactly seem like an issue for me. If society wishes to make legs seem suggestive, that is society's messed up choice, but you can see many sets of legs just by going to the beach, yet people do not riot there.. Unless this is ToS violating, which I wouldn't think it would be, there's no reason to remove the screenshot or crop it.

Ridersyl · Post by **Ridersyl** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:05 am

I do not intend to waive my right to a trail.

I also humbly request that the charges be amended to specify the target of such crimes, so that it does not appear to the common eye that such crimes targeted Osiris.

Ainocra · Post by **Ainocra** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 3:37 am

I have edited my original post to reflect the target.
I should have included that initially, my apologies

War Wombat · Post by **War Wombat** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:23 pm

Tim Stark wrote:Mon Jan 19, 2015 6:06 amNot sure if I'm able to post here or not, but it doesn't exactly seem like an issue for me. If society wishes to make legs seem suggestive, that is society's messed up choice, but you can see many sets of legs just by going to the beach, yet people do not riot there.. Unless this is ToS violating, which I wouldn't think it would be, there's no reason to remove the screenshot or crop it.

I apologize. I have no intention of rioting. I merely did not expect to see that when I clicked on the evidence link.

Seker · Post by **Seker** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:11 pm

The Pschent should be advised that I approve of the motion for a trial.

Theoden Sebastian · Post by **Theoden Sebastian** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:45 pm

The Pschent takes note of this petition, and advises the parties to wait until the Presiding Justice renders the approval or dismissal of the same in accordance with Sec. 1.2 of Article III of the Rules of the Pschent.

Honors