[DEFEATED] WA Peacekeeping Charter

Der Angreifer · Post by **Der Angreifer** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:33 pm

The Assembly of Worlds,

Believing prevention of conflict or restoration of peacetime activities to be one of the foremost goals of this august body, and that an international organization dedicated to this effort would be of great use,

Reaffirming prior resolutions preventing the WA from becoming a military force used as a tool against those the majority of WA voters do not like,

Article I - Restrictions on WA Force

Prohibits any WA organizations or committees from engaging in offensive military actions with any WA member states, citizens thereof, or organizations affiliated with such states, for any reason whatsoever;

Prohibits WA personnel from carrying lethal weapons on WAHQ property. WA personnel are committee members and employees of the WA.

Article II - Scope of Peacekeeping Operations and Standards

Establishes the WA Peacekeepers, whose goal shall be to prevent and end conflict, and preserve peace. Peacekeepers shall adhere to these principles:

Consent of all parties involved in its operations. No peacekeeping effort shall be made without the consent of all WA member nations involved, and without the request of at least one member nation involved.

Impartiality in proceedings and conflicts. Peacekeepers shall maintain professionalism at all times and give equal consideration to the involved parties.

Non-use of force. Except in cases of self defense, Peacekeepers are to refrain from using lethal force, and shall be prohibited from carrying lethal weapons. Peacekeepers are to avoid using non-lethal force on state actors.

Tasks the WA Peacekeepers with the following duties:

Assistance in reintegrating former combatants back into civilian society

Assistance in disarmament and demobilizing of military forces,

Organization of elections or government reorganization or establishment, or monitoring thereof

Monitoring the fulfillment of obligations created by armistices or ceasefires

Protection of the WA-recognized rights of citizens of member nations and support for the rule of law

Assistance in international mediation and resolving potential causes for international conflict

Prohibits the WA from expanding the role of the WA Peacekeepers to include any efforts that cannot be considered one of the above duties;

Further tasks Peacekeepers with:

Maintaining the legitimacy of WA actions

Actively involving national and local governments in its operations to promote personal ownership over the success of Peacekeeping operations

Forming clear and achievable mandates in Peacekeeping efforts;

Authorizes the WA Peacekeepers to:

request appropriate WA funds to support its operations,

conduct research into safe and effective non-lethal weapons systems, armor, and defense technologies to increase the safety of WA personnel

Clarifies that the WA Peacekeepers are not a military force, nor are they ever to be used as such,

Article III - Responsibility of Member Nation-States

Encourages WA Member nations to make a genuine commitment to maintaining peace, maintain a Unity of Purpose with the WA, actively support Peacekeeping efforts where possible, refrain from hindering WA operations or movement, and communicate effectively with WA personnel

Prohibits member nations from using WA organizations or committees to defend themselves from other nations, from fraudulently requesting WA peacekeeping efforts, and from intentionally launching military, terrorist, or criminal attacks against WA property or officials.

Citizens may vote aye, nay, or abstain.

Der Angreifer · Post by **Der Angreifer** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:33 pm

Post by **Wrektopia** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:35 pm

Nnnnnnoooooooooooooooo

nope

Sygian · Post by **Sygian** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:35 pm

I don't even know if this is legal.. I don't know much about the GA but it's looks iffy to me.

Nay.

Craverland · Post by **Craverland** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:39 pm

viper944 · Post by **viper944** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:21 pm

Post by **Adytus** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:27 pm

Sygian wrote:Sat Nov 19, 2016 8:35 pmI don't even know if this is legal.. I don't know much about the GA but it's looks iffy to me.

Nay.

It's legal. They allowed resolutions on peacekeepers not to long ago I think.

Nay

LexerMercs · Post by **LexerMercs** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:28 pm

Nay.

Post by **Weast Jurmany** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:32 pm

Nay, in fact make that Hell to the Nay!

Sygian · Post by **Sygian** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 4:58 pm

Thanks for the clarification, Adytus! <3