[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Archive of General Assembly proposal discussion threads.

Moderators: Pharaoh, Sub-Vizier, Vizier, Chief Vizier

Post Reply
Auralia
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:00 am

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Auralia »

Responsibility In Transferring Arms
A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament | Strength: Mild | Proposed by: Sciongrad

The General Assembly,

Reaffirming its commitment to promoting international peace and goodwill,

Recognizing the extreme hazard to national populations posed by the unregulated trade of armaments,

Hoping to limit the involvement of member nations and their citizens in violence made possible by the aforementioned unregulated trade of armaments,

1. Defines "armament" as military equipment, specifically weapons and ammunition, which possesses a practical application in military conflict, including the designs or subassemblies necessary in their construction or production;

2. Defines "transfer" as the movement of an armament from one member nation, political subdivision thereof, or non-state entity associated with a member nation to any other such entity, including non-member nations and non-state entities not associated with any nation;

3. Defines "end-user certificate" as an affidavit completed by the buyer of armaments subject to the provisions of this resolution which verifies that said buyer is the final recipient of the product;

4. Defines "conquest" as the acquisition of territory through military force by a successful state at the expense of another state; for the purpose of this resolution, conquest shall not include:

instances where member nations seek to neutralize hostile states that pose a persistent or existential threat to their sovereignty or security or

instances where member nations seek to reclaim territory taken from them by force with no intervening period of de facto peace;

5. Assures member nations of the exclusive right to determine purely internal arms trading and firearm policy, excepting:

those regulations recognized by the terms of this resolution or extant international law,

future regulations which seek to prevent firearms from being sold to or used by individuals that pose a danger of performing imminent lawless action, or

future resolutions which seek to relax regulations on purchasing firearms for recreational reasons only;

6. Mandates that the export of armaments by any manufacturer, exporter, or broker operating within a member nation shall make the transfer of their armaments to an intended final recipient conditional on the completion of an end-user certificate by the buyer;

7. Urges member nations to implement systems of end-use monitoring to ensure that the end-user certificate is authentic, when possible;

8. Prohibits the international transfer of armaments if:

there is reasonable evidence to suggest they will be used in contravention of extant World Assembly legislation on human rights,

there is reasonable evidence to suggest they will be diverted from their originally intended recipient, except in instances where the transfer is absolutely necessary in protecting national security, provided that even those transfers do not violate the other provisions of this resolution or,

there is reasonable evidence to suggest they will be used to initiate, or aid the party conducting, a war of conquest and;

9. Further prohibits the transfer of armaments to non-member nations with the intent of transferring them to nations where the aforementioned circumstances apply.
Auralia
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:00 am

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Auralia »

I support this legislation, which is in many respects similar to real life international arms control rules.

Frankly, if it were up to me, the World Assembly would completely ban wars of conquest and require the application of just war principles when determining when and how to pursue conflict with other states.

A nice side effect of this resolution is that it serves as a blocker for internal gun control legislation, with the exception of a few relatively unobjectionable categories.
User avatar
Adytus
Posts: 10910
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:00 am

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Adytus »

Nay.
The Anarchic Republic of AdytusLord Sarah of House Rahl, the Mirkhan Clan Syb: Ady is my favorite pervy CV.
Wrek: Adytus is just the personification of 69.
User avatar
Sygian
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:00 am

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Sygian »

Aye

Sub-Vizier of Foreign Affairs
Patriarch of House Akhenaten
Baron of Koptos
Spoiler
Guardian
Chief Vizier
Chief Scribe
Vizier of WA Affairs (2x)
Forum Administrator
Spoiler
User avatar
Kowassati
Posts: 2233
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:00 am
Location: Osiris

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Kowassati »

Nay. The idea is good but wording is off put
Bucket full of blood, gotcha on my mind
I'm gonna break my face on the sweet sunshine
Spoiler



Chief Vizier (Osiris)
Foreign Affairs Vizier (Osiris)
Protector of the Realm (Lazarus)
Grandee Secretary (Lazarus)
Vice Delegate (Lazarus)
Delegate (Lazarus)
User avatar
Transdavisia
Posts: 1232
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 12:00 am
Location: Plano, Texas
Contact:

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Transdavisia »

Aye


[11:18:38 PM] Knot: Brihimia wins gold.
Spoiler
Auralia
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:00 am

[Passed] Responsibility In Transferring Arms

Post by Auralia »

Responsibility in Transferring Arms was passed 12,006 votes to 5,040.
Post Reply

Return to “Shrine of Amun”