[Passed] Amendments to the Scroll of Ma'at
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 5:35 pm
I spent a little bit of time going over the scroll of Ma'at. I had a few notes that I felt like working into an amendment, but this is not at all exaustive. If you've spotted something in the Scroll that's either exploitable in a bad way or is vague, we can add it into an omnibus amendment here. Let me outline the biggest issue first.
Right now the Council of Priests has veto power over Pharonic Succession but also has a place in the line of succession if there's no heir. This could conceivably lead to a Priest becoming permanent "acting pharaoh". While this situation is unlikely (incredibly so with our current priests in fact) it's not impossible.
With that said I've been discussing and thinking about possible fixes to this issue. I think the simplest solution is to have an heir selected long before one is needed.
I'd like to propose the following change in regards to that:
First we remove 4.1.5 from the Scroll completely. For reference that's this part:
For that I propose the following alterations to 3.1.2:
After that, we'd insert a new 3.1.3 and 3.1.4:
Anyway. That's a start. If there are any other problems that people have noticed, we can work on an omnibus amendment to correct them.
Right now the Council of Priests has veto power over Pharonic Succession but also has a place in the line of succession if there's no heir. This could conceivably lead to a Priest becoming permanent "acting pharaoh". While this situation is unlikely (incredibly so with our current priests in fact) it's not impossible.
With that said I've been discussing and thinking about possible fixes to this issue. I think the simplest solution is to have an heir selected long before one is needed.
I'd like to propose the following change in regards to that:
First we remove 4.1.5 from the Scroll completely. For reference that's this part:
That's the bit that sticks the Priests into the line of succession. That solves most of the problem on its own, but leaves us with no solution for who takes over if the Pharaoh abdicates or disappears without a successor.(5) In the event that the Pharaoh abdicates without a successor being chosen and approved, the Priest with the highest endorsement count may serve as acting Pharaoh, and the Council will appoint a new Pharaoh with the approval of the Council of Scribes.
For that I propose the following alterations to 3.1.2:
will becomeThe Pharaoh will serve until abdication and will, with the approval of the Council of Scribes and the Council of Priests, choose a successor upon abdication. Resignation or expulsion from the World Assembly or ceasing to exist will be considered automatic abdication.
This removes the "upon abdication" language, thus allowing the Pharaoh to select his successor months or years in advance if needed. It also changes the generic "successor" language to "Royal Heir".The Pharaoh will serve until abdication and will, with the approval of the Council of Scribes and the Council of Priests, choose a Royal Heir. Resignation or expulsion from the World Assembly or ceasing to exist will be considered automatic abdication.
After that, we'd insert a new 3.1.3 and 3.1.4:
The remainder of the section (what is currently 3.1.3 through 3.1.8) would be renumbered 3.1.5 through 3.1.10.(3) The Royal Heir will, after approval by both the Council of Scribes and Council of Priests, hold the second highest number of endorsements to the Pharaoh. Upon a Pharaoh's abdication, the Royal Heir will succeed automatically to the office of Pharaoh.
(4) The Pharaoh retains the capacity to vacate the office of Royal Heir at any time prior to abdication.
Anyway. That's a start. If there are any other problems that people have noticed, we can work on an omnibus amendment to correct them.