This looks incredibly over-arching to me, and seems that it should be far better managed by individual nationstates.Right to sexual privacy
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category:Human Rights | Strength: Significant | Proposed by: Bananaistan Description:
Description: The General Assembly,
Recognising the rights of individuals to privacy in their sexual relationships,
Resolving to uphold and protect this right from undue interference, while
Affirming that society in general has a legitimate public interest in
- preventing procreation in incestuous unions,
- restricting the exploitation of vulnerable or underage individuals, and
- enforcing fair sexual ethics in professions,
Hereby:
1) Defines “individual sexual activity”, for the purposes of this resolution, as acts undertaken individually without any other participant for the purposes of achieving sexual arousal of the individual,
2) Defines “collective sexual activity”, for the purposes of this resolution, as acts undertaken with at least one other participant for the purposes of achieving sexual arousal of one or more of the participants,
3) Defines “age of consent” as the age at which an individual is considered by local law to be legally responsible for actively consenting to engage in collective sexual activity,
4) Establishes the right of all individuals to privacy in their individual sexual activities,
5) Establishes the right of individuals who have reached the age of consent to privacy in their sexual relationships and collective sexual activities,
6) Mandates that member states shall not restrict, regulate, proscribe or criminalise any individual sexual activity where such individual sexual activity is practised in private and away from public exposure,
7) (a) Mandates that member states shall not restrict, regulate, proscribe or criminalise any collective sexual activity between consenting individuals who have reached the age of consent where such collective sexual activity is practised in private and away from public exposure, save that
(b) Member states are permitted to establish in law prohibited degrees of consanguinity and may restrict, regulate, proscribe or criminalise sexual activity between individuals falling within a prohibited degree of consanguinity but only to the extent that such sexual activity could result in procreation, or
(c) In respect of collective sexual activity by individuals who have responsibility for or authority over another individual, member states are permitted to restrict, regulate, proscribe or criminalise such collective sexual activity, but shall only hold accountable in law the individual in the position of responsibility or authority, or
(d) Member states are permitted to allow the exercise of disciplinary power by organisations on members and employees who engage in sexual activity with individuals for whom they are directly professionally responsible or otherwise directly exercise authority over,
8) Establishes the right of member states not to set an age of consent, in which case the protections of clauses 5 & 7 (a) shall apply only to individuals who are otherwise considered legally competent to conduct their own affairs within the particular jurisdiction,
9) Requires that member states exercise their discretionary powers under this resolution in a fair, unbiased and non-discriminatory manner. Should a member state or subdivisions thereof implement a national or local age of consent or legal competence law, such laws shall make no reference to the gender status or the sexual orientation of the participating individuals nor shall collective sexual activities be subcategorised in such laws.
Opposed.
