Ma'at Kheru: Condemn The Red Fleet
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:52 pm
Condemn The Red Fleet
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Red Fleet
Proposed by: Valvendia
Description: Recognizing the numerous raids conducted by The Red Fleet against: capitalist, fascist, and imperialistic regions;
Further recognizing the countless regions held hostage, threatened, and destroyed due to their political stance, by The Red Fleet;
Noting that these regions were raided regardless of their activity or neutrality;
Further noting the blatant and inexcusable persecution and intolerance of capitalists, fascist, and imperialistic regions, at the hands of The Red Fleet;
Appalled that not only has the Security Council not condemned the region, but in fact commends them;
Believing that the actions conducted by The Red Fleet are motivated by prejudice and intolerance;
Convinced that The Red Fleet will only continue to cause more destruction and dismay to other innocent regions, unless action is taken;
Further believing it is The Security Councils' duty to condemn a destructive, prejudice, and dictatorial region, to further preserve and protect the political rights of all nations and regions.
Hereby condemns The Red Fleet.
Ministry Recommendation: Against, of course. This is an obviously biased and misinformed proposal to say the least. The author talks about the conflicts between The Red Fleet and fascist regions, only to go on and call The Red Fleet a region with "prejudice." (Oh, the irony.) The Red Fleet has had a comprehensive and long history of fighting racist, facist regions that are pitted with prejudice such as Nazi Europe and the Greater German Reich. In addition to that, their contributions in liberating Anne Frank back in 2014 were significant and major in freeing the region. However, putting history, values, and everything aside, one can easily vote against this based on its language usage and lack of support. I don't see the names of any regions, incidents, or examples to backup any of the author's limited and overly simple points. Phew, so yeah, definitely Against.
Please cast a vote of For, Against, or Abstain.
~ Tomb
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: The Red Fleet
Proposed by: Valvendia
Description: Recognizing the numerous raids conducted by The Red Fleet against: capitalist, fascist, and imperialistic regions;
Further recognizing the countless regions held hostage, threatened, and destroyed due to their political stance, by The Red Fleet;
Noting that these regions were raided regardless of their activity or neutrality;
Further noting the blatant and inexcusable persecution and intolerance of capitalists, fascist, and imperialistic regions, at the hands of The Red Fleet;
Appalled that not only has the Security Council not condemned the region, but in fact commends them;
Believing that the actions conducted by The Red Fleet are motivated by prejudice and intolerance;
Convinced that The Red Fleet will only continue to cause more destruction and dismay to other innocent regions, unless action is taken;
Further believing it is The Security Councils' duty to condemn a destructive, prejudice, and dictatorial region, to further preserve and protect the political rights of all nations and regions.
Hereby condemns The Red Fleet.
Ministry Recommendation: Against, of course. This is an obviously biased and misinformed proposal to say the least. The author talks about the conflicts between The Red Fleet and fascist regions, only to go on and call The Red Fleet a region with "prejudice." (Oh, the irony.) The Red Fleet has had a comprehensive and long history of fighting racist, facist regions that are pitted with prejudice such as Nazi Europe and the Greater German Reich. In addition to that, their contributions in liberating Anne Frank back in 2014 were significant and major in freeing the region. However, putting history, values, and everything aside, one can easily vote against this based on its language usage and lack of support. I don't see the names of any regions, incidents, or examples to backup any of the author's limited and overly simple points. Phew, so yeah, definitely Against.
Please cast a vote of For, Against, or Abstain.
~ Tomb