[Proposal] Repeal "Condemn Lone Wolves United]
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:53 pm
Repeal "Condemn Lone Wolves United"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC#74 | Proposed by: Tim Stark
Description: WA Security Council Resolution #74: Condemn Lone Wolves United shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: The Security Council:
Noting that Lone Wolves United does indeed have an extensive history regarding the invasion and subjugation of sovereign regions,
Acknowledging, however, that the initial resolution was written with intentional sensationalism and stretching of truth in mind,
Observing that the clause regarding the ban of SalusaSecondus from its home region was clearly put in as a sarcastic quip due to the nation's pretitle, holding no actual condemnable merit,
Decrying the fact that the clause regarding the infiltration of Gardeshia was penned with the full knowledge that it was told in a one-sided manner, with a full ignorance of detail from anything that wasn't the Lone Wolves United endorsed version of the story.
Further noting the absence of significant reasons for its condemnation that could have been added instead of the one-sided and sensationalist reasons that were present,
Determining that it is a sensible solution to repeal this resolution, so that a more representative and honest one be able to take its place,
Hereby Repeals SC#74: Condemn Lone Wolves United.
Quite obviously, I'd like to repeal my resolution that condemned Lone Wolves United. Looking back on it, the amount of stretched truth within that resolution, as well as ignorance of dissenting details, means many parts of SC74 were clearly stretched to portions where they were little more than loaded buzz words. I do have the intent of then passing a new and improved resolution with better extrapolation in areas that need it, and removal of the obvious stretches that were present before. If y'all want me to already have that draft posted and ready to instant-submit if I can force this through the queue and into passage then I can do that. I kind of want to take it one at a time and hope people give me enough trust to believe my intent to re-author a better condemnation.
No, I promise this is not a conspiracy given all the Evil Wolf focus lately. I've been meaning to pen this for a long time, and have finally gotten around to doing it.
Oh, and obviously, any edits/pointing out that this is illegal language/calls of treason, are always welcomed. I haven't written one of these since 2011 so I'm fairly rusty.
-Tim
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC#74 | Proposed by: Tim Stark
Description: WA Security Council Resolution #74: Condemn Lone Wolves United shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: The Security Council:
Noting that Lone Wolves United does indeed have an extensive history regarding the invasion and subjugation of sovereign regions,
Acknowledging, however, that the initial resolution was written with intentional sensationalism and stretching of truth in mind,
Observing that the clause regarding the ban of SalusaSecondus from its home region was clearly put in as a sarcastic quip due to the nation's pretitle, holding no actual condemnable merit,
Decrying the fact that the clause regarding the infiltration of Gardeshia was penned with the full knowledge that it was told in a one-sided manner, with a full ignorance of detail from anything that wasn't the Lone Wolves United endorsed version of the story.
Further noting the absence of significant reasons for its condemnation that could have been added instead of the one-sided and sensationalist reasons that were present,
Determining that it is a sensible solution to repeal this resolution, so that a more representative and honest one be able to take its place,
Hereby Repeals SC#74: Condemn Lone Wolves United.
Quite obviously, I'd like to repeal my resolution that condemned Lone Wolves United. Looking back on it, the amount of stretched truth within that resolution, as well as ignorance of dissenting details, means many parts of SC74 were clearly stretched to portions where they were little more than loaded buzz words. I do have the intent of then passing a new and improved resolution with better extrapolation in areas that need it, and removal of the obvious stretches that were present before. If y'all want me to already have that draft posted and ready to instant-submit if I can force this through the queue and into passage then I can do that. I kind of want to take it one at a time and hope people give me enough trust to believe my intent to re-author a better condemnation.
No, I promise this is not a conspiracy given all the Evil Wolf focus lately. I've been meaning to pen this for a long time, and have finally gotten around to doing it.
Oh, and obviously, any edits/pointing out that this is illegal language/calls of treason, are always welcomed. I haven't written one of these since 2011 so I'm fairly rusty.
-Tim