Osiris Fraternal Order

Zaolat wrote:Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:42 am

Koth wrote:Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:56 amThrowing an idea out there as devil's advocate: perhaps we should have an election with the options "Tim" and "Re-open nominations". it'd probably be the more democratic way to do it.

Personally, I don't actually give a fuck and I wish Tim the best in his new term

I'm behind that all the way along as two conditions are met. The process doesn't take flipping forever, and RON can only win once. After RON wins we start the process over and if no one stands against at least one other standee, then what Ainocra just did is finalized.

I agree with this also. While I do believe that Tim would win if a vote was had anyway, this sets a dangerous precedent.

Also, personally I didn't know this law was in place because I was planning on voting to RON. Not because I don't believe in Tim or want him to continue as pharaoh, but he didn't even make a campaign. Perhaps that was because he saw he was the only one running? Whatever the case, just because one person is running, I want to see them show that they can put the efforts in to convey why they are running. I don't even know what Tim's plans are for his second term. How can I vote for someone I have no idea what they plan to do?

I am not pleased with the handling of the election on those fronts.

Regardless of the controversy and where I stand on it, congratulations Pharaoh Tim Montresor-Stark!

Congratulations, Tim!

Hi folks. I wasn't aware this law even existed, and was planning to have my campaign thread up later today for the voting period. Sorry, life's been busy and I kind of forgot to make it because for me, campaign threads mean writing two hours of fluff and the like. I'd be 10/10 with having a vote for the formality of the situation, as it would also mean I'd get you all that campaign thread.

If we don't have it, then I'll just put all that stuff into my inauguration speech, and hope people still actually ask me questions and stuff.