Osiris Fraternal Order

Tim Stark wrote:Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:46 amThat is all. This is not part of a conspiracy to cut our Europeia, TNI, and Albion treaties and embassies. There is absolutely no reason to cut relations with three of our strongest allies, and I hope there will continue to be no reason to do so.

Nor our LKE treaty or embassy, since NES is parsing words so carefully.

I see no reason for the Osiris Fraternal Order to have relations with regions who harbor forum crashers, or regions who tolerate those regions.

I agree with NES as well. Surely one man will not reflect the overall policies of an entire region. While I understand the reason behind the statement, I am not entirely sure if it was worded appropriately. It comes off too strong, and regardless of the truth behind its exact meaning, it leaves room for doubt and vagueness, which can easily be misinterpreted.

Cormac wrote:Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:48 am

Tim Stark wrote:Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:46 amThat is all. This is not part of a conspiracy to cut our Europeia, TNI, and Albion treaties and embassies. There is absolutely no reason to cut relations with three of our strongest allies, and I hope there will continue to be no reason to do so.

Nor our LKE treaty or embassy, since NES is parsing words so carefully.

I do not wish to intervene in this internal discussion's substance, but I fear there is a factual misunderstanding of the LKE's treaties which should be corrected.

What NES said was:

What we're doing is going out of our way here to deliberately cause tensions with regions that are treatied with Ainur - namely Europeia, TNI and Albion.

He states that he is discussing the regions which are treatied with Ainur. You draw attention to the omission of the LKE.

I post to clarify, in case there is confusion, that the LKE is not treatied with Ainur, which will be why NES did not list it.

Thank you for the clarification, Onder. I realized what NES meant after posting.