[Passed] Securing Nuclear Materials From Dastardly Menaces
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 8:09 pm
For.
The importance of ensuring the right of WA Nations to own nuclear weapons cannot be understated. The above examination by Auralia leans heavily on real world laws, but of course the WA isn't the real world. The primary issue with leaving open the possibility of a WA resolution that bans nuclear weapons is that not all nations are *in* the WA. Therefore they would not be bound by such a resolution. This, instead, ensures that no such resolution can ever come about.
Furthermore, the basic language used in promoting the securing of nuclear weapons is a step above what we currently have, and new resolutions can cover anything the piece at vote has missed. This is an important piece of legislation and frankly I'd like to see it pass.
The importance of ensuring the right of WA Nations to own nuclear weapons cannot be understated. The above examination by Auralia leans heavily on real world laws, but of course the WA isn't the real world. The primary issue with leaving open the possibility of a WA resolution that bans nuclear weapons is that not all nations are *in* the WA. Therefore they would not be bound by such a resolution. This, instead, ensures that no such resolution can ever come about.
Furthermore, the basic language used in promoting the securing of nuclear weapons is a step above what we currently have, and new resolutions can cover anything the piece at vote has missed. This is an important piece of legislation and frankly I'd like to see it pass.
