Osiris Fraternal Order

*ahem*

I am speaking in this post as defense counsel for Treize Dreizehn.

It is my duty to inform you that Cameron Romefeller has brought charges of defamation against Pharaoh Joshua Ravenclaw and Scribe of Ma'at Treize Dreizehn.

My client has not committed any such defamation, and the plaintiffs refusal to post any evidence, and indeed commitment to "fake evidence just to prove it" is a clear and deliberate slap at the justice system of Osiris.

These charges are obviously baseless and unfounded, as indicated by the plaintiffs inability to find even a shred of actual evidence to support them.

At no point did my client personally publish any claims against Cameron Romefeller's character. The standard for defamation in this region is, however, quite stringent:

(a) "Defamation" is defined as any attempt to publicly attack the character of a citizen or foreign guest of the Osiris Fraternal Order with unsubstantiated or imaginary claims, with the malicious intent to cause serious damage to the reputation of that individual.

My client's entire involvement in any sort of public comment was to provide logs to the executive detailing a security threat. My client was not the one who published the charges, nor has he made any public claims on the character of Cameron Romefeller. And even if he had, such claims, being based on the logs at the root of this matter, would be neither unsubstantiated nor imaginary.

I would like to ask the court to consider any faked evidence as defamation, and request that the Scribe of Seshat react accordingly.

Any Priests of Seshat who falsify evidence will face disciplinary measures from my office (and from the Pharaoh, if necessary).

I caution the counsel for the prosecution to tread carefully, there is a certain standard of conduct and dignity this Court expects from all its parties, particularly so for the very agents tasked with the furtherance of justice.

Again, the prosecution is ordered to present evidence it feels necessary for the case.

We have none, and unfortunately we cannot fake evidence.

Faking of evidence is surely beyond question. It will not be entertained by this Court.

Counsel for the Prosecution, have you communicated this with your client, the lack of evidence I mean?

Your honor,

The defense agrees with the prosecution that there is no evidence against my client. Indeed, logs exist that show my client did not defame Mr Romefeller. The claims against Cammy were neither unsubstantiated nor imaginary, nor is malicious intent demonstrable. The defense seeks to demonstrate the, to be frank, farcical nature of the charges against my client.

My client states the logs as his evidence which led to his entrapment and thus his defamation. That's the only thing resembling evidence he said to me over private conversation.

Where are the logs you speak of, counsel? As of current, there is no way for us to determine even the slightest suggestion of possibility of the charges your client have brought before this Court.

The ones originally posted before this, Zeorus gave me the link, but I closed it out and don't recall where it is.

Can they be recovered, counsel?