for

I don't like it, so no.

<r>I don't recall ever having something like that happen here, I've really only seen it in TNP with their monster constitution. But it might be an idea if one wanted to test the legality of something constitution-based?<br/> <br/> As security vizier, I'd recommend the following change, or something ...

<t>My only concern is the timing, I almost think this should go into effect the moment the new government is enacted. Else, a saavy lawyer type could try weaseling in after continuing to war by saying 'new government, I never fought you, let me in'. <br/> <br/> It doesn't mean much when the amnesty ...

so, you're the fat one in the top corner - the reporter? *ducks

<r> I would like to bring this into consideration - and I'd like the Admins to weigh in, since it's their powers we're trying to codify outside the criminal code. I also suspect that my legal-eze will need some rewording, it's been a while. <br/> <br/> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Section 9: Administration ...

<t>Forum destruction is always a cardinal crime, pretty much wherever you go in the civilized world. If we get someone like that so high up, we'd have to boot them. As security vizier, it's my job to ferret those types out. But if one gets past, we'll just have to suck up whatever damage might incur...

<r>I've been asked by a few newer arrivals 'who the hell are you, and why are people scared of you?' So, I decided to grab my old resume from Equilism and update it, as 'Ive been a lot of places' didn't seem to cover it, and I'm tired of typing the same thing over and over.<br/> <br/> ... and yes, I...

Cheers!

<t>I'm not sure I understood that. Do you mean - if we undertake in undercover ops to destroy another forum, and they're caught, we'd ban em (and thus piss em off?)<br/> <br/> In 12 years of NS, I've never destroyed or ordered a destruction of a forum as a black operation - that just does not happen...